Additional suggestions for improvements in the text, figures and captions
to Golub & Pasachoff 'NEAREST STAR':

1) In Fig. 2.5 on page 43 there are strange gaps in the butterfly wings
   1980, 1981 and even more pronounced in 1983, although these are not
   years of activity minima: The impression is that there have been much 
   less sunspots for months or even no sunspots for half a year. I guess 
   there are some problems with the completeness of the data used or/and 
   the drawing program ? There exist butterfly diagrams of this period 
   without these gaps.

2) The peak in the Fraunhofer 'energy distribution' appears not in the
   yellow-green, but in the yellow-orange region: See the colored spectrum
   offered in my review.

3) It may be a problem of the two authors writing different parts of
   the book: On page 21 it is stated that Wollaston observed the gaps 
   in the spectrum in 1802 and Fraunhofer his lines in 1811. On page 57 
   these years are 1804 and 1814, respectively. - To my knowledge the
   first date from page 21 (1802) and the second one from page 57 (1814)
   are correct.

4) Since the reader has no natural guideline by the colors in the spectra
   displayed, it should be mentioned that in Figs. 1.1 (page 3) and
   Fig. 3.3 (page 58) the direction of the wavelength is from long (red)
   to short (blue) wavelengths, while this is inverted - as more usual -
   from blue to red in Fig. 3.4 (page 59).

5) In the caption to Fig. 3.4 (page 59) there is an error: 3900 angstroms
   are not 400 nanometers, but 390 nanometers !

6) HESSI is not the shortening of High Energy Solar Spectral Imager (as
   stated on page 168), but High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (as given in
   the WWW page cited on page 169/70).